Ricardo PeresRicardo Peres

My feedback

  1. 1,083 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    Check!
    (thinking…)
    Reset
    or sign in with
    • facebook
    • google
      Password icon
      I agree to the terms of service
      Signed in as (Sign out)
      You have left! (?) (thinking…)
      started  ·  Mark StaffordMark Stafford responded

      Good news: this is coming – and not just on entity types but on complex types as well. Enums are part of the OData v4 protocol. In fact, it was one of the things we argued vociferously for precisely because of the number of votes on this issue.

      Ricardo PeresRicardo Peres commented  · 

      Its almost unbelievable that this isn't already implemented!

      Ricardo PeresRicardo Peres supported this idea  · 
    • 251 votes
      Vote
      Sign in
      Check!
      (thinking…)
      Reset
      or sign in with
      • facebook
      • google
        Password icon
        I agree to the terms of service
        Signed in as (Sign out)
        You have left! (?) (thinking…)
        started  ·  Mark StaffordMark Stafford responded

        Good news: this is another thing that we felt was really important to take to the OData v4 protocol committee. This feature will be available in the near future as we finish work on our v4 stack.

        Ricardo PeresRicardo Peres supported this idea  · 
      • 1,186 votes
        Vote
        Sign in
        Check!
        (thinking…)
        Reset
        or sign in with
        • facebook
        • google
          Password icon
          I agree to the terms of service
          Signed in as (Sign out)
          You have left! (?) (thinking…)
          Ricardo PeresRicardo Peres commented  · 

          I agree this is a must have!
          Other required properties:

          - Clustered/unclustered;
          - Unique;
          - Group name (to allow indexes over many properties; if it is empty, it applies to just the property where it is declared; if it is not empty, all properties with the same group name are added to the index definition.

          This has some problems, however:

          - The actual column name may be explicitly defined in configuration by code;
          - The actual SQL to use for index creation depends on the current DB engine.

          Hope the Entity Framework team can do something about these problems, this is quite necessary!

        • 280 votes
          Vote
          Sign in
          Check!
          (thinking…)
          Reset
          or sign in with
          • facebook
          • google
            Password icon
            I agree to the terms of service
            Signed in as (Sign out)
            You have left! (?) (thinking…)
            Ricardo PeresRicardo Peres supported this idea  · 
          • 2,148 votes
            Vote
            Sign in
            Check!
            (thinking…)
            Reset
            or sign in with
            • facebook
            • google
              Password icon
              I agree to the terms of service
              Signed in as (Sign out)
              You have left! (?) (thinking…)
              Ricardo PeresRicardo Peres supported this idea  · 

            Feedback and Knowledge Base