As Ralf says, “This is part of OData 4.0, see http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/odata-v4.0-part3-csdl.html#_Toc360208810”;
This is part of OData 4.0, see http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/odata-v4.0-part3-csdl.html#_Toc360208810
As Ralf says, “This is part of OData 4.0, see http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/odata-v4.0-part1-protocol.html#_Toc360208376”;
This is part of OData 4.0, see http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/odata-v4.0-part1-protocol.html#_Toc360208376
As Ralf says, “This is part of OData 4.0, see http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/odata-v4.0-part2-url-conventions.html#_Toc360800825”;
This is part of OData 4.0, see http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata/v4.0/odata-v4.0-part2-url-conventions.html#_Toc360800825
As Ralf points out, this feature will be an extension to OData v4. Implementing this part of the protocol is not an immediate priority for us, but we will continue to watch the feedback on this and other channels.
I suggest waiting until http://docs.oasis-open.org/odata/odata-data-aggregation-ext/v4.0/odata-data-aggregation-ext-v4.0.html is approved.
Good news: this is another thing that we felt was really important to take to the OData v4 protocol committee. This feature will be available in the near future as we finish work on our v4 stack.
1,081 votes14 comments · [Closed] WCF Data Services Feature Suggestions · Flag idea as inappropriate… · Admin →
Good news: this is coming – and not just on entity types but on complex types as well. Enums are part of the OData v4 protocol. In fact, it was one of the things we argued vociferously for precisely because of the number of votes on this issue.