John Doe

My feedback

  1. 36 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  2. 130 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    John Doe commented  · 

    I can't express how much I like this idea

    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  3. 207 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  4. 35 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  5. 45 votes
    Vote
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    John Doe supported this idea  · 
  6. 153 votes
    Sign in
    (thinking…)
    Password icon
    Signed in as (Sign out)

    We’ll send you updates on this idea

    John Doe commented  · 

    Loading the object in memory and incrementing a property can cause incorrect results when concurrent transactions attempt to do the same. Using optimistic concurrency can eliminate the issue, but in high traffic scenarios, it doesn't seem feasible to reload the object and attempt to increment the property again since the other transactions will be forced to do the same. I'd like to be able to send Value = Value + 1 query to the database.

    John Doe supported this idea  · 

Feedback and Knowledge Base